Hence reading is self-mastery, because the self (and its affirmations) are held in check while the author (and his structures of thought) are fully attended to. True diversity in literature would be to read authors in circumstances as different from our own as possible, because we might then imagine ourselves as different than we are — not the creature of circumstances, but their master. Reading is fundamental, all right: to a person’s ethical development.
-
ferretdokhtar liked this
-
quotidianthoughts reblogged this from hours
-
gollykeeper reblogged this from wildshieldmaiden
-
the-scaredy-cat liked this
-
fuckyeahpali liked this
-
wildshieldmaiden reblogged this from notyourgramma
-
hours reblogged this from michaelfunderburk and added:
“To read an author is to read someone different from ourselves. Reading is not a means of self-affirmation, but of...
-
hours liked this
-
michaelfunderburk reblogged this from hollandmatt
-
hollandmatt reblogged this from ayjay
-
hollandmatt liked this
-
lunchboy reblogged this from ayjay
-
jayrobinson liked this
-
tobeginwhereiam liked this
-
tiedtothewrist liked this
-
lauracricket reblogged this from ayjay
-
lauracricket liked this
-
jas0njames liked this
-
shakesphereanrag liked this
-
christianitype liked this
-
portraitoftheartistasayoungman reblogged this from ayjay
-
gad37 liked this
-
gad37 reblogged this from ayjay
-
triadic reblogged this from ayjay
-
ayjay posted this